H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Irakli Labadze H2H: 1-1
Max Mirnyi and Irakli Labadze are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Irakli Labadze leads 1–0 on clay, while Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irakli Labadze won the 2004 Estoril fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 45
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2004* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Irakli Labadze | 6-3 6-3 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-1 7-5 | Irakli Labadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Irakli Labadze | #656 | #42 | 805 | 1,679 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Irakli Labadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #109 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #72 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #78 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #140 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #164 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |