H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Peter Wessels H2H: 1-0
Max Mirnyi holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Wessels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2005 San Jose third round 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-3 | Peter Wessels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Peter Wessels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |