H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-1
Max Mirnyi holds a 2–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay, while Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2005 Nottingham third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2005* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Max Mirnyi | 6-2 6-0 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2004* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-1 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1999* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Sargis Sargsian | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |