H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mel Purcell vs Shlomo Glickstein H2H: 2-0
Mel Purcell holds a 2–0 lead over Shlomo Glickstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mel Purcell leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mel Purcell won the 1983 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 68
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1983* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Mel Purcell | 6-0 7-6 | Shlomo Glickstein | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mel Purcell | 6-4 6-4 7-5 | Shlomo Glickstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Shlomo Glickstein | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,864 | 159 | 147 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mel Purcell | Shlomo Glickstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #34 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #167 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |