H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mel Purcell vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 1-2
Wojtek Fibak holds a 2–1 lead over Mel Purcell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wojtek Fibak leads 2–0 on carpet, while Mel Purcell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1984 Wembley third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1984* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 6-4 6-2 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1981* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1980 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Mel Purcell | 6-1 6-3 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mel Purcell | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |