H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Menno Oosting vs David De Miguel H2H: 1-0

Menno Oosting holds a 1–0 lead over David De Miguel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Menno Oosting leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Menno Oosting won the 1987 Dutch Open round of 32 4-6 7-6 6-2.

NED Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Menno Oosting #161 4-6 7-6 6-2 David De Miguel Match data Jul 30, 1987* R32 Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Menno Oosting #818 #72 152 1,629 22 34 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
David De Miguel — — — 1,561 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Menno Oosting David De Miguel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1984 0–1 0.0% #344 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1985 4–6 40.0% #156 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1986 4–4 50.0% #133 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1987 1–4 20.0% #152 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1988 10–12 45.5% #156 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1989 1–4 20.0% #258 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1991 2–2 50.0% #481 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #819 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Menno Oosting David De Miguel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1987 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 6 3 9 66.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 11 21 47.6% 8 15 23 34.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — 0 2 2 0.0% 15 29 44 34.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Menno Oosting David De Miguel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1528 116.8 — — — — — +39 — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–1 — +0.05
20 1984 1493 102.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 1985 1544 120.1 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 — — +0.24
21 1985 1483 107.1 — — — — +54 +50 — 41.7% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +1.29 1986 1542 116.2 — — — — — +38 — 36.6% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.0 +0.82
22 1986 1520 108.7 — — — — — +54 — 42.9% -1.00 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — +0.65 1987 1477 101.4 — — — — — +50 — 30.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.79
23 1987 1494 100.9 — — — — — +54 — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.41 1988 1481 100.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.34
24 1988 1574 116.7 — — — — +49 -102 +1 45.0% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 106.3 +0.92 1989 1477 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22
25 1989 1554 113.6 — — — — +39 — — 25.0% -1.83 0–1 — — -0.42 1990 1462 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.10
27 1991 1561 107.9 -0.93 -0.97 0.968 49.9% — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 0–1 — +0.34 1992 1455 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
30 1994 1545 — -3.04 -1.35 1.207 55.0% — — — — — — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1630 115.8 -1.46 -1.07 1.030 51.2% +47 +14 +1 40.4% -0.88 9–5 (64%) 12–6 (67%) 111.2 +5.82 — 1562 118.4 — — — — — +38 — 35.2% -0.95 3–8 (27%) 6–5 (55%) 96.2 +3.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.