H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Michael Berrer vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0
Michael Berrer holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Berrer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Berrer won the 2009 Vienna third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2009* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Michael Berrer | 6-3 6-2 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Berrer | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |