H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 5-1

Michael Chang holds a 5–1 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1994 US Open first round 6-4 6-2 6-2.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-4 6-2 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #89 Match data
Aug 27, 1993* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #7 4-6 6-3 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #45 Match data
Aug 21, 1992* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #4 6-2 6-1 Andrei Cherkasov #29 Match data
May 7, 1992* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Michael Chang #6 6-1 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #30 Match data
Mar 8, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Chang #15 6-4 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #32 Match data
Sep 2, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #50 6-4 6-4 6-3 Michael Chang #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34