H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 7-0

Michael Chang holds a 7–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1993 Rome Masters quarterfinal 6-3 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 1993* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Michael Chang #10 6-3 5-7 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #33 Match data
Feb 19, 1993* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #7 6-2 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #31 Match data
Feb 13, 1993* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #7 6-4 6-0 Andrei Chesnokov #37 Match data
Mar 9, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Michael Chang #9 6-3 6-4 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #19 Match data
Oct 11, 1991* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #20 6-3 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #24 Match data
Nov 12, 1989* Wembley ATP 250 QF Carpet Michael Chang #6 6-3 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #24 Match data
Jun 11, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Michael Chang #19 6-1 5-7 7-6 7-5 Andrei Chesnokov #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7