H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 7-1

Michael Chang holds a 7–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1999 Paris Masters quarterfinal 5-7 7-6(6) 6-4.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Michael Chang #72 5-7 7-6(6) 6-4 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Aug 14, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #58 6-1 6-4 Cedric Pioline #26 Match data
Oct 23, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #25 7-5 1-6 6-4 Michael Chang #2 Match data
Sep 3, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Michael Chang #2 6-3 0-6 5-7 7-5 6-1 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Mar 16, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Chang #3 6-3 6-2 Cedric Pioline #30 Match data
Nov 5, 1994* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #9 6-4 7-5 Cedric Pioline #43 Match data
Aug 13, 1994* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #7 6-2 3-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #18 Match data
Jul 10, 1992* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Michael Chang #7 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 Cedric Pioline #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5