H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs David Prinosil H2H: 5-1

Michael Chang holds a 5–1 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Paris Masters fourth round 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 18, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet David Prinosil #44 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Michael Chang #29 Match data
May 6, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Michael Chang #15 6-4 3-6 6-1 David Prinosil #105 Match data
Apr 12, 1997* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #3 6-1 7-6(5) David Prinosil #49 Match data
Aug 22, 1996* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #3 6-1 6-3 David Prinosil #64 Match data
May 29, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Michael Chang #4 6-1 6-1 6-2 David Prinosil #46 Match data
Apr 1, 1993* Osaka ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #9 6-1 4-6 6-4 David Prinosil #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,800 165 208 44.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,584 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,633 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,630 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1996 24–23 51.1% #39 1,779 0 2
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,633 0 2
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,622 0 2
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,672 0 2
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2000 22–17 56.4% #38 1,788 0 3
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,606 0 3
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,593 0 3
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,521 0 3
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,515 0 3