H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0

Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1996 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #5 6-2 6-1 6-2 David Rikl #81 Match data Jan 17, 1996* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Michael Chang #7 6-3 6-3 David Rikl #86 Match data Jan 16, 1994* F Jakarta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,687 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,531 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,536 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,534 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 — — — — — — —
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,564 0 0
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 — — — — — — —
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 — — — — — — —
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang David Rikl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1994 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 7 15 22 31.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 13 32 45 28.9% 32 46 78 41.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang David Rikl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% 1991 2/4 2.0 4.5 58.4% 69.4% 48.3% 66.3% 33.3% 60.9% 31.4%
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% 1992 11/12 1.5 3.7 55.8% 61.4% 43.4% 57.2% 40.8% 53.2% 40.0%
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% 1993 18/20 1.8 3.6 56.0% 64.5% 45.1% 51.7% 47.0% 56.1% 36.7%
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% 1994 43/47 2.8 3.8 56.8% 64.9% 49.0% 55.1% 40.8% 58.2% 35.4%
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% 1995 20/20 3.8 4.4 53.3% 67.9% 49.0% 55.8% 44.4% 59.4% 39.0%
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% 1996 27/31 2.1 3.3 58.8% 64.2% 45.1% 56.8% 40.0% 56.5% 36.7%
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% 1997 7/7 5.4 5.9 55.2% 67.9% 44.5% 60.4% 56.0% 57.4% 39.2%
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% 1999 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.4% 82.1% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 67.1% 34.9%
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 129/145 2.7 3.9 56.4% 65.2% 46.9% 55.6% 43.0% 57.4% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang David Rikl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1989 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.28
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1990 1492 101.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1991 1474 99.3 -0.87 -1.37 0.804 47.8% +55 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1992 1503 110.9 -3.14 -0.80 0.856 47.2% — +80 — 41.4% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.71
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1993 1532 121.2 -2.57 -0.92 0.837 46.7% -53 +80 — 37.0% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.11
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1994 1536 126.2 -2.08 -2.48 0.847 47.1% -44 +135 — 38.9% -0.83 5–8 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.69
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1995 1534 123.3 -1.30 -0.19 0.959 49.3% -48 +102 — 42.0% -0.48 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1996 1529 123.0 -3.53 -0.97 0.843 46.6% -13 +41 — 39.0% -0.89 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1997 1578 115.2 -1.18 +1.34 0.921 48.9% -56 — +29 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.27
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 1999 1565 98.3 -0.24 +1.75 1.063 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.03
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1687 125.9 -2.34 -1.19 0.867 47.4% -37 +85 +29 39.5% -0.81 15–30 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 91.8 +2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.