H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-0

Michael Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1989 Charleston round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Perez
URU Age 64 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #20 6-3 6-3 Diego Perez #147 Match data May 12, 1989* R16 Charleston ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Diego Perez #1,263 #27 389 1,824 195 213 47.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Diego Perez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,486 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1980 0–1 0.0% #211 1,473 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1981 16–15 51.6% #94 1,652 0 0
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1982 11–16 40.7% #100 1,657 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1983 19–14 57.6% #51 1,728 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1984 15–16 48.4% #52 1,659 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1985 30–21 58.8% #55 1,763 0 1
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1986 30–25 54.5% #61 1,692 0 1
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1987 15–19 44.1% #116 1,668 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1988 12–17 41.4% #142 1,608 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1989 17–17 50.0% #112 1,651 0 1
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 1990 12–18 40.0% #132 1,594 0 1
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 1991 5–9 35.7% #176 1,572 0 1
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 1992 11–10 52.4% #128 1,619 0 1
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1993 2–13 13.3% #253 1,511 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #661 1,498 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Diego Perez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 11 15 26 42.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — —
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 28 16 44 63.6% — — — — — — — —
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 22 18 40 55.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 15 13 28 53.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — —
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 32 49 81 39.5% 162 156 318 50.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 44/51 of Diego Perez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Diego Perez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% 1991 10/14 2.5 1.6 68.2% 64.4% 54.5% 54.3% 44.9% 61.3% 42.0%
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% 1992 20/21 3.0 2.4 60.0% 63.8% 50.4% 52.5% 45.3% 58.6% 43.7%
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% 1993 13/15 1.8 3.7 58.0% 60.3% 44.7% 49.0% 31.2% 53.0% 36.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 0.0 3.0 63.0% 47.1% 43.3% 60.0% 28.6% 45.7% 42.9%
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 44/408 2.5 2.6 61.4% 62.5% 49.5% 52.0% 40.7% 57.3% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Diego Perez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 1979 1486 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.22
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1980 1473 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.11
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1981 1652 145.1 — — — — — +48 — 56.3% +0.03 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.45
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1982 1658 141.1 — — — — — +31 — 47.8% -0.18 4–9 (31%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.92
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1983 1728 141.3 — — — — -150 +8 — 54.1% +0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.26
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1984 1659 138.8 — — — — -149 +78 — 52.0% +0.03 2–8 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.21
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1985 1763 138.5 — — — — -270 +48 — 53.9% +0.37 9–2 (82%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.70
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1986 1693 137.4 — — — — -108 +6 — 51.6% +0.21 9–7 (56%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.43
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1987 1669 132.4 — — — — -52 -12 — 44.7% -0.31 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) — -2.18
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1988 1609 125.1 — — — — -4 0 — 45.3% -0.41 8–9 (47%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.14
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 1989 1651 135.0 — — — — -57 +26 — 50.0% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.06
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 1990 1594 127.7 — — — — -38 +95 — 42.3% -0.83 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.79
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 1991 1573 118.5 -0.06 +0.92 1.086 51.0% -20 +66 — 41.7% -0.36 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.11
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 1992 1619 123.6 -1.94 +2.72 1.058 51.0% -104 +109 — 50.9% +0.25 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.51
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 1993 1511 108.3 -3.89 -1.43 0.785 45.0% -47 +102 — 29.3% -1.93 0–6 (0%) 2–0 — -0.34
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1498 98.3 +1.21 -2.79 0.789 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1825 141.5 -2.02 +0.96 0.967 49.1% -84 +41 — 48.7% -0.11 58–74 (44%) 41–56 (42%) 92.5 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.