H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Michael Chang vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-2

Michael Chang and Fabrice Santoro are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fabrice Santoro #54 7-5 6-1 6-1 Michael Chang #142 Match data
Aug 18, 2001* Washington ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #63 6-2 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #21 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fabrice Santoro #47 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-4 Michael Chang #33 Match data
Jun 19, 1997* Rosmalen ATP 250 R32 Grass Michael Chang #2 4-6 6-4 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6