H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 2-1

Michael Chang holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Michael Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1999 San Jose third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 1999* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #26 6-3 6-2 Fernando Meligeni #59 Match data
May 1, 1997* Atlanta ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Meligeni #72 2-6 6-3 6-4 Michael Chang #2 Match data
May 4, 1996* Atlanta ATP 250 QF Clay Michael Chang #4 6-1 7-5 Fernando Meligeni #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 185 199 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Fernando Meligeni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,696 0 1
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1996 13–16 44.8% #94 1,651 0 2
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,710 0 2
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,655 0 3
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3