H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 4-2

Michael Chang holds a 4–2 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1999 Los Angeles fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 30, 1999* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #70 6-4 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #73 Match data
Oct 28, 1998* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillaume Raoux #47 7-6(5) 6-3 Michael Chang #25 Match data
Jan 23, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Guillaume Raoux #46 6-4 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Michael Chang #3 Match data
Jan 21, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Michael Chang #5 6-2 6-2 7-6(6) Guillaume Raoux #71 Match data
Nov 10, 1991* Birmingham ATP 250 F Carpet Michael Chang #17 6-3 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #141 Match data
Jun 14, 1991* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Michael Chang #10 7-5 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —