H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 0-1

Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1988 Charleston round of 32 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Horacio de la Pena
ARG Age 60 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio de la Pena #110 7-6 7-5 Michael Chang #155 Match data Apr 28, 1988* R32 Charleston ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,833 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Horacio de la Pena
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,734 0 1
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,643 0 1
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,737 0 1
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,721 0 3
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,551 0 3
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,594 0 4
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 — — — — — — —
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 — — — — — — —
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 — — — — — — —
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Horacio de la Pena
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1984 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 18 14 32 56.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1987 0 5 5 0.0% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 7 16 23 30.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1994 — — — — 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 24 34 58 41.4% 159 129 288 55.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Horacio de la Pena
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 1984 1548 126.7 — — — — — +36 — 47.6% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1985 1690 129.7 — — — — -65 -50 — 53.6% -0.07 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.63
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1986 1734 143.7 — — — — -95 +41 — 58.3% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.16
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1987 1643 127.6 — — — — -87 +98 — 47.2% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.41
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1988 1737 136.6 — — — — -122 +90 — 56.6% +0.42 10–5 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.19
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1989 1651 127.5 — — — — -43 +105 — 48.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.13
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1990 1725 133.8 — — — — -197 +118 — 59.5% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.57
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1991 1722 138.0 — — — — -245 +79 — 50.7% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.62
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1992 1552 118.2 — — — — — +61 — 36.5% -1.29 1–8 (11%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1993 1595 127.5 — — — — — +37 — 52.7% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.20
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 1994 1556 113.8 — — — — — +6 — 41.0% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.33
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1833 138.3 — — — — -105 +55 — 51.7% +0.12 53–56 (49%) 52–47 (53%) 98.5 +1.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.