H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 2-5

Ivan Lendl holds a 5–2 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1992 Tokyo Indoor semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Lendl #9 6-3 6-4 Michael Chang #4 Match data Oct 17, 1992* SF Tokyo Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #9 6-2 6-3 Michael Chang #4 Match data Aug 29, 1992* SF Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Ivan Lendl #7 6-3 7-6(7) Michael Chang #4 Match data Aug 22, 1992* QF New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #11 6-3 6-2 Michael Chang #5 Match data Aug 16, 1992* SF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Michael Chang #15 2-6 4-6 6-4 7-6 9-7 Ivan Lendl #5 Match data Dec 15, 1991* SF Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 6-1 6-3 Michael Chang #5 Match data Nov 28, 1989 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Michael Chang #19 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-3 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Jun 7, 1989* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Ivan Lendl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91
32 — — — — — — — 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92
33 — — — — — — — 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94
34 — — — — — — — 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Ivan Lendl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4%
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0%
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7%
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8%
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1%
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 225/250 of Ivan Lendl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Ivan Lendl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% 1991 62/73 7.3 3.1 54.8% 76.4% 54.6% 64.9% 47.8% 66.6% 41.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 68/75 6.7 2.8 55.5% 76.8% 54.4% 64.4% 43.8% 66.7% 41.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 52/56 6.3 2.3 56.4% 74.6% 50.0% 56.4% 42.3% 63.6% 40.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 43/46 7.1 2.4 53.5% 75.8% 54.0% 61.7% 41.4% 65.6% 41.3%
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 225/1,272 6.8 2.7 55.2% 76.0% 53.4% 62.2% 44.1% 65.7% 41.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Ivan Lendl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.