H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 2-5

Ivan Lendl holds a 5–2 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1992 Tokyo Indoor semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 1992* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 SF Carpet Ivan Lendl #9 6-3 6-4 Michael Chang #4 Match data
Aug 29, 1992* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Ivan Lendl #9 6-2 6-3 Michael Chang #4 Match data
Aug 22, 1992* New Haven ATP 250 QF Hard Ivan Lendl #7 6-3 7-6(7) Michael Chang #4 Match data
Aug 16, 1992* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Ivan Lendl #11 6-3 6-2 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Dec 15, 1991* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals SF Carpet Michael Chang #15 2-6 4-6 6-4 7-6 9-7 Ivan Lendl #5 Match data
Nov 28, 1989 Masters ATP Finals RR Carpet Ivan Lendl #1 6-1 6-3 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Jun 7, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Michael Chang #19 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-3 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Ivan Lendl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91
32 — — — — — — — 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92
33 — — — — — — — 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94
34 — — — — — — — 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94