H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jaime Yzaga H2H: 2-3

Jaime Yzaga holds a 3–2 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 3–0 on clay, while Michael Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1994 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-3 5-7 1-6 7-5.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
PER Age 58 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jaime Yzaga #27 6-2 6-3 5-7 1-6 7-5 Michael Chang #8 Match data
Aug 16, 1992* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Chang #5 6-3 6-1 Jaime Yzaga #82 Match data
May 11, 1991* Charlotte ATP 250 QF Clay Jaime Yzaga #76 7-6(0) 6-1 Michael Chang #10 Match data
Mar 17, 1991* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Michael Chang #12 6-3 6-2 Jaime Yzaga #62 Match data
May 6, 1989* Forest Hills ATP 250 SF Clay Jaime Yzaga #56 6-4 6-3 Michael Chang #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jaime Yzaga #381 #18 1,391 1,870 238 205 53.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jaime Yzaga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1985 4–3 57.1% #45 1,604 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1986 19–18 51.4% #64 1,680 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1987 23–20 53.5% #70 1,708 0 2
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1988 20–19 51.3% #65 1,715 0 3
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1989 32–16 66.7% #23 1,843 0 3
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1990 18–20 47.4% #87 1,696 0 3
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1991 24–17 58.5% #53 1,766 0 4
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1992 25–18 58.1% #49 1,687 0 6
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1993 30–21 58.8% #31 1,779 0 8
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1994 28–27 50.9% #31 1,726 0 8
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1995 13–24 35.1% #107 1,613 0 8
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1996 2–2 50.0% #379 1,608 0 8
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34