H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 5-1

Michael Chang holds a 5–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1996 US Open fourth round 6-3 6-4 6-2.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 4, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Michael Chang #3 6-3 6-4 6-2 Jakob Hlasek #50 Match data
Jan 19, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Michael Chang #5 6-1 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #43 Match data
Oct 13, 1995* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #5 6-1 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #53 Match data
Apr 20, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #8 6-1 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #88 Match data
Feb 18, 1994* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #9 4-6 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #79 Match data
Nov 11, 1990* Wembley ATP 250 F Carpet Jakob Hlasek #26 7-6 6-3 Michael Chang #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,516 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5