H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 5-1

Michael Chang holds a 5–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1996 US Open round of 16 6-3 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #3 6-3 6-4 6-2 Jakob Hlasek #50 Match data Sep 4, 1996* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Michael Chang #5 6-1 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #43 Match data Jan 19, 1996* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Michael Chang #5 6-1 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #53 Match data Oct 13, 1995* R16 Tokyo Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Michael Chang #8 6-1 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #88 Match data Apr 20, 1995* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Michael Chang #9 4-6 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #79 Match data Feb 18, 1994* R16 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Jakob Hlasek #26 7-6 6-3 Michael Chang #16 Match data Nov 11, 1990* F Wembley ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Jakob Hlasek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3%
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Jakob Hlasek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0%
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2%
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3%
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8%
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4%
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Jakob Hlasek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.84
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.04
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.17
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) — +0.10
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.72
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) — -1.83
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) — -0.85
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.05
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — -0.58
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) — -1.64
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.57
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.32
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) — -1.57
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.84
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.