H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 4–3 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2002 Los Angeles Open round of 32 4-6 6-2 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 4-6 6-2 7-6(7) | Michael Chang | Match data | Jul 25, 2002* | R32 | Los Angeles Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-5 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data | Jun 12, 2002* | R64 | Queen's Club Championships | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Michael Chang | 6-7(2) 6-3 (ret.) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data | Jul 30, 2000* | F | Los Angeles Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-5 7-5 | Michael Chang | Match data | May 17, 2000* | R64 | Hamburg Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-2 7-6(4) | Michael Chang | Match data | Oct 15, 1999* | R16 | Brisbane International | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-3 7-5 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data | Oct 9, 1999* | QF | Shanghai Masters | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-3 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data | Apr 24, 1997* | R32 | Orlando | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,113 | 649 | 305 | 68.0% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 34 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,949 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,919 | 1 | 4 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,003 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,006 | 1 | 19 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,011 | 1 | 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,991 | 1 | 26 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,911 | 1 | 31 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,848 | 1 | 33 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,790 | 1 | 33 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,807 | 1 | 34 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,699 | 1 | 34 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,624 | 1 | 34 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 40 | 8 | 48 | 83.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1997 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 43 | 10 | 53 | 81.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1998 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1994 | 35 | 10 | 45 | 77.8% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 1999 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1995 | 31 | 10 | 41 | 75.6% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 2000 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1996 | 48 | 9 | 57 | 84.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2001 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1997 | 42 | 9 | 51 | 82.4% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2002 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1998 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2003 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2004 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 27 | 16 | 43 | 62.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2005 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 404 | 172 | 576 | 70.1% | 98 | 52 | 150 | 65.3% | 30 | 25 | 55 | 54.5% | 117 | 56 | 173 | 67.6% | — | 160 | 126 | 286 | 55.9% | 10 | 32 | 42 | 23.8% | 23 | 21 | 44 | 52.3% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 1991 | 52/67 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 56.2% | 68.0% | 54.6% | 55.2% | 47.7% | 61.8% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 66/81 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 63.8% | 68.8% | 54.8% | 55.7% | 47.9% | 63.5% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 67/83 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 58.4% | 69.7% | 56.4% | 64.2% | 45.7% | 64.3% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 71/85 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 56.1% | 73.8% | 56.4% | 58.8% | 46.7% | 66.1% | 43.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 72/84 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 54.7% | 76.9% | 55.3% | 60.0% | 43.9% | 66.9% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 72/82 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 50.2% | 77.2% | 53.5% | 61.0% | 49.3% | 65.3% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 59/71 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 52.1% | 74.6% | 53.9% | 63.7% | 46.3% | 64.7% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 43/51 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 54.3% | 74.8% | 52.5% | 61.7% | 47.0% | 64.6% | 41.1% | 2003 | 43/47 | 10.1 | 3.1 | 56.5% | 75.0% | 47.9% | 60.7% | 48.3% | 63.4% | 36.0% |
| 27 | 1999 | 41/49 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 56.0% | 72.0% | 51.8% | 56.3% | 45.2% | 63.0% | 40.3% | 2004 | 43/43 | 11.7 | 3.1 | 59.1% | 76.0% | 47.7% | 57.9% | 38.7% | 64.3% | 34.3% |
| 28 | 2000 | 56/68 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 55.8% | 70.2% | 51.0% | 59.6% | 49.8% | 61.7% | 41.4% | 2005 | 15/15 | 12.3 | 3.9 | 56.6% | 76.7% | 45.9% | 58.6% | 27.7% | 63.3% | 32.1% |
| 29 | 2001 | 34/37 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 57.9% | 69.7% | 47.4% | 57.7% | 39.3% | 60.1% | 40.1% | 2006 | 2/2 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 47.8% | 73.2% | 44.1% | 59.7% | 35.0% | 57.0% | 39.4% |
| 30 | 2002 | 21/25 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 55.0% | 70.1% | 48.0% | 55.0% | 42.2% | 60.2% | 35.1% | 2007 | 2/2 | 9.5 | 5.5 | 58.7% | 79.4% | 39.2% | 37.5% | 20.8% | 62.8% | 26.7% |
| 31 | 2003 | 12/12 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 56.2% | 69.1% | 46.1% | 31.4% | 34.7% | 59.2% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 666/954 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 55.9% | 72.4% | 53.6% | 59.0% | 46.2% | 63.9% | 42.5% | — | 105/392 | 11.1 | 3.4 | 57.5% | 75.7% | 47.3% | 58.8% | 40.7% | 63.6% | 34.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1559 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 52.2% | +0.09 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1842 | 146.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -249 | -283 | 59.2% | +0.61 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -1.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 1978 | 162.9 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -75 | -313 | 68.9% | +1.37 | 8–6 (57%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -2.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 1920 | 158.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -23 | -163 | 59.6% | +0.75 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.26 | 1995 | 1487 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 19 | 1991 | 2003 | 160.6 | +1.22 | +4.46 | 1.132 | 52.5% | +33 | -67 | -258 | 61.4% | +0.91 | 18–7 (72%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -1.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 1966 | 166.2 | +1.99 | +7.08 | 1.233 | 54.0% | +51 | -96 | — | 65.1% | +1.24 | 16–8 (67%) | 8–18 (31%) | — | -1.65 | 1997 | 1520 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 1–0 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.59 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1992 | 160.0 | +2.60 | +5.19 | 1.207 | 53.4% | +28 | -138 | -270 | 66.4% | +1.22 | 23–10 (70%) | 12–16 (43%) | — | +1.44 | 1998 | 1755 | 144.7 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -222 | -139 | 53.4% | +0.32 | 13–4 (76%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | +0.72 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2007 | 157.5 | +3.82 | +5.50 | 1.290 | 54.5% | -9 | -130 | -197 | 71.3% | +1.45 | 14–8 (64%) | 19–7 (73%) | — | +0.39 | 1999 | 1763 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -263 | -154 | 51.2% | +0.26 | 8–11 (42%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -2.53 |
| 23 | 1995 | 2011 | 165.8 | +4.79 | +5.90 | 1.302 | 54.6% | +1 | +38 | — | 70.0% | +1.41 | 16–5 (76%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | -0.91 | 2000 | 1819 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -296 | -44 | 56.3% | +0.60 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–17 (37%) | — | -1.79 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1992 | 167.8 | +3.39 | +6.79 | 1.284 | 54.8% | +58 | -22 | — | 70.3% | +1.62 | 16–3 (84%) | 11–9 (55%) | — | -0.94 | 2001 | 1759 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +67 | -256 | -39 | 61.9% | +0.81 | 8–6 (57%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | +0.99 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1911 | 157.1 | +2.72 | +5.34 | 1.224 | 53.9% | +68 | +21 | -176 | 66.3% | +1.37 | 17–7 (71%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | +0.71 | 2002 | 1756 | 148.6 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -275 | -49 | 51.9% | +0.44 | 11–10 (52%) | 11–14 (44%) | — | -0.54 |
| 26 | 1998 | 1849 | 144.8 | +1.95 | +2.83 | 1.163 | 52.9% | +24 | +87 | — | 65.1% | +1.02 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +2.82 | 2003 | 1644 | 133.1 | +0.95 | -1.36 | 0.983 | 50.0% | +72 | -213 | +27 | 48.2% | +0.07 | 5–6 (45%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +1.55 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1791 | 141.4 | +0.54 | +2.18 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +20 | +46 | — | 54.0% | +0.38 | 9–9 (50%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | +0.91 | 2004 | 1596 | 125.6 | +0.40 | -1.44 | 0.961 | 49.5% | +33 | -178 | +70 | 44.1% | -0.30 | 3–7 (30%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | +1.48 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1807 | 140.0 | -0.26 | +3.59 | 1.080 | 51.7% | -11 | -12 | -72 | 56.2% | +0.47 | 15–9 (63%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | +0.86 | 2005 | 1559 | 116.9 | -1.32 | -3.12 | 0.876 | 47.9% | +9 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.61 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1699 | 128.0 | -1.43 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 49.8% | -10 | +24 | -7 | 44.9% | -0.13 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–9 (25%) | — | +0.59 | 2006 | 1569 | 105.0 | -1.55 | +1.41 | 0.916 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 30 | 2002 | 1624 | 130.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.882 | 48.0% | +20 | +41 | +34 | 35.3% | -0.71 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | -0.72 | 2007 | 1505 | 103.5 | -0.27 | -2.33 | 0.719 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 31 | 2003 | 1551 | 127.1 | -0.91 | -1.10 | 0.800 | 46.1% | +26 | — | — | 24.1% | -1.59 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.78 | 2008 | 1506 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1508 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2114 | 161.6 | +2.11 | +4.69 | 1.178 | 53.1% | +21 | -33 | -160 | 62.8% | +0.99 | 188–106 (64%) | 147–149 (50%) | 98.2 | -0.36 | — | 1949 | 145.6 | +0.33 | -1.61 | 0.952 | 49.4% | +35 | -250 | -44 | 51.3% | +0.24 | 62–56 (53%) | 82–87 (49%) | 100.1 | -0.01 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 12 | 12 | 24 | Feb 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 7 | 15 | 22 | Mar 19, 2003 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 9 | 12 | 21 | Aug 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 8 | 12 | 20 | Jul 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Todd Woodbridge | 14 | 3 | 17 | Oct 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 11 | 13 | Feb 14, 2004 | H2H |
| Sjeng Schalken | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 16, 2003 | H2H |
| Justin Gimelstob | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jan 6, 2005 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 3 | 4 | 7 | Aug 4, 2006 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jul 25, 2002 | H2H |