H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 5-0

Michael Chang holds a 5–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1997 Hong Kong fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-1.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 1997* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #3 6-4 4-6 6-1 Jeff Tarango #72 Match data
Apr 19, 1996* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #4 5-7 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #83 Match data
Oct 13, 1994* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Michael Chang #9 4-6 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Jeff Tarango #78 Match data
Aug 6, 1993* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #9 6-1 6-0 Jeff Tarango #70 Match data
Feb 23, 1991* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #15 6-3 7-5 Jeff Tarango #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2