H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 3-1

Michael Chang holds a 3–1 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–0 on carpet, while Jeremy Bates leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1995 Beijing fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 1995* Beijing ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #5 6-3 6-2 Jeremy Bates #120 Match data
Jul 28, 1994* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-1 6-3 Jeremy Bates #77 Match data
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jeremy Bates #113 6-4 6-3 6-3 Michael Chang #7 Match data
Nov 9, 1990* Wembley ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #16 6-3 6-3 Jeremy Bates #118 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 116 174 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1981 1–1 50.0% #372 1,494 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1982 0–2 0.0% #341 1,469 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1988 14–18 43.8% #152 1,617 0 0
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,658 0 0
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,527 0 0
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,570 0 0
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,579 0 0
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,593 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,617 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1