H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Michael Chang and Jim Courier are tied 12–12 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 24 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 8–7 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 5–2 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Memphis round of 32 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 6-4 7-6(8) | Michael Chang | Match data | Feb 18, 1999* | R32 | Memphis | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-3 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data | Jul 25, 1998* | QF | Washington Open | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Jim Courier | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Michael Chang | Match data | Apr 26, 1998* | F | Orlando | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Michael Chang | 7-5 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data | Oct 26, 1996* | R16 | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Michael Chang | 6-2 7-5 | Jim Courier | Match data | Nov 14, 1995 | RR | ATP Finals | ATP Finals | Carpet |
| Jim Courier | 6-2 7-6(5) | Michael Chang | Match data | Nov 5, 1995* | QF | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Jim Courier | 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 7-5 | Michael Chang | Match data | Sep 8, 1995* | QF | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | Jim Courier | Match data | Aug 13, 1995* | QF | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-4 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data | Apr 22, 1995* | SF | Hong Kong Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jim Courier | 6-4 7-5 | Michael Chang | Match data | Apr 15, 1995* | SF | Japan Open | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data | Feb 11, 1995* | SF | San Jose | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data | Feb 19, 1994* | SF | Philadelphia | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Carpet |
| Michael Chang | 6-4 6-0 | Jim Courier | Match data | Nov 15, 1993 | RR | ATP Finals | ATP Finals | Carpet |
| Jim Courier | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 | Michael Chang | Match data | May 16, 1993* | SF | Italian Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Jim Courier | 6-2 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data | Apr 17, 1993* | SF | Hong Kong Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jim Courier | 6-4 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data | Mar 7, 1993* | SF | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Jim Courier | 7-5 6-2 | Michael Chang | Match data | Nov 16, 1992 | RR | ATP Finals | ATP Finals | Carpet |
| Jim Courier | 7-5 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data | Apr 19, 1992* | F | Hong Kong Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jim Courier | 6-2 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data | Apr 11, 1992* | SF | Japan Open | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-2 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data | Mar 19, 1992* | SF | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-3 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data | Feb 9, 1992* | F | San Francisco | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-4 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data | Dec 14, 1991* | R16 | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | Carpet |
| Jim Courier | 7-5 6-2 | Michael Chang | Match data | Aug 10, 1991* | R16 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Michael Chang | 6-3 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data | Aug 19, 1989* | R16 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,113 | 649 | 305 | 68.0% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 34 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,216 | 489 | 223 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 23 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,919 | 1 | 4 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,003 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,862 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,049 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 68–16 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,074 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,006 | 1 | 19 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,011 | 1 | 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,890 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,991 | 1 | 26 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,989 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,911 | 1 | 31 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,852 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,848 | 1 | 33 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,790 | 1 | 33 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,807 | 1 | 34 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,699 | 1 | 34 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,624 | 1 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1988 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 18 | 1990 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1989 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1991 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 1990 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 20 | 1992 | 40 | 8 | 48 | 83.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1991 | 37 | 8 | 45 | 82.2% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 21 | 1993 | 43 | 10 | 53 | 81.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1992 | 36 | 6 | 42 | 85.7% | 15 | 2 | 17 | 88.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% |
| 22 | 1994 | 35 | 10 | 45 | 77.8% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 1993 | 39 | 9 | 48 | 81.3% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
| 23 | 1995 | 31 | 10 | 41 | 75.6% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 1994 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1996 | 48 | 9 | 57 | 84.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1995 | 49 | 12 | 61 | 80.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 1997 | 42 | 9 | 51 | 82.4% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1996 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1998 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1997 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1999 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 1998 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 28 | 2000 | 27 | 16 | 43 | 62.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1999 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 29 | 2001 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 404 | 172 | 576 | 70.1% | 98 | 52 | 150 | 65.3% | 30 | 25 | 55 | 54.5% | 117 | 56 | 173 | 67.6% | — | 285 | 114 | 399 | 71.4% | 108 | 45 | 153 | 70.6% | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 70 | 47 | 117 | 59.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 473/566 of Jim Courier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 1991 | 52/67 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 56.2% | 68.0% | 54.6% | 55.2% | 47.7% | 61.8% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 66/81 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 63.8% | 68.8% | 54.8% | 55.7% | 47.9% | 63.5% | 45.0% | 1991 | 60/74 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 63.3% | 73.8% | 56.0% | 62.7% | 44.2% | 67.4% | 41.3% |
| 21 | 1993 | 67/83 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 58.4% | 69.7% | 56.4% | 64.2% | 45.7% | 64.3% | 43.1% | 1992 | 69/84 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 60.8% | 77.6% | 55.0% | 64.3% | 45.3% | 68.7% | 41.7% |
| 22 | 1994 | 71/85 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 56.1% | 73.8% | 56.4% | 58.8% | 46.7% | 66.1% | 43.7% | 1993 | 61/75 | 4.9 | 2.7 | 60.8% | 75.1% | 56.5% | 67.7% | 45.3% | 67.9% | 41.7% |
| 23 | 1995 | 72/84 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 54.7% | 76.9% | 55.3% | 60.0% | 43.9% | 66.9% | 43.1% | 1994 | 54/62 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 61.6% | 75.3% | 53.5% | 59.7% | 45.0% | 66.8% | 40.8% |
| 24 | 1996 | 72/82 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 50.2% | 77.2% | 53.5% | 61.0% | 49.3% | 65.3% | 44.5% | 1995 | 66/79 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 62.0% | 75.7% | 54.4% | 67.1% | 47.4% | 67.5% | 40.1% |
| 25 | 1997 | 59/71 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 52.1% | 74.6% | 53.9% | 63.7% | 46.3% | 64.7% | 43.2% | 1996 | 40/45 | 5.9 | 3.2 | 60.1% | 74.7% | 53.8% | 57.4% | 43.4% | 66.6% | 39.6% |
| 26 | 1998 | 43/51 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 54.3% | 74.8% | 52.5% | 61.7% | 47.0% | 64.6% | 41.1% | 1997 | 43/53 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 73.7% | 52.8% | 54.7% | 45.2% | 65.1% | 38.2% |
| 27 | 1999 | 41/49 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 56.0% | 72.0% | 51.8% | 56.3% | 45.2% | 63.0% | 40.3% | 1998 | 31/36 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 64.3% | 71.9% | 52.8% | 60.1% | 36.6% | 64.9% | 36.9% |
| 28 | 2000 | 56/68 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 55.8% | 70.2% | 51.0% | 59.6% | 49.8% | 61.7% | 41.4% | 1999 | 41/49 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 66.0% | 75.0% | 55.7% | 62.7% | 39.4% | 68.4% | 36.5% |
| 29 | 2001 | 34/37 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 57.9% | 69.7% | 47.4% | 57.7% | 39.3% | 60.1% | 40.1% | 2000 | 8/9 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 59.3% | 72.8% | 52.6% | 60.6% | 42.6% | 64.7% | 34.7% |
| 30 | 2002 | 21/25 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 55.0% | 70.1% | 48.0% | 55.0% | 42.2% | 60.2% | 35.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 12/12 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 56.2% | 69.1% | 46.1% | 31.4% | 34.7% | 59.2% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 666/954 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 55.9% | 72.4% | 53.6% | 59.0% | 46.2% | 63.9% | 42.5% | — | 473/712 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 61.9% | 75.0% | 54.6% | 62.5% | 44.1% | 67.2% | 39.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Michael Chang | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1559 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 52.2% | +0.09 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.3 | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1842 | 146.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -249 | -283 | 59.2% | +0.61 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–4 (33%) | 103.5 | -1.45 | 1987 | 1484 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 17 | 1989 | 1978 | 162.9 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -75 | -313 | 68.9% | +1.37 | 8–6 (57%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.1 | -2.14 | 1988 | 1712 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -126 | — | 58.0% | +0.40 | 5–6 (45%) | 9–2 (82%) | 104.7 | -0.43 |
| 18 | 1990 | 1920 | 158.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -23 | -163 | 59.6% | +0.75 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | 103.0 | -1.26 | 1989 | 1879 | 152.8 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -151 | — | 59.7% | +0.64 | 7–10 (41%) | 12–7 (63%) | 102.2 | -3.51 |
| 19 | 1991 | 2003 | 160.6 | +1.22 | +4.46 | 1.132 | 52.5% | +33 | -67 | -258 | 61.4% | +0.91 | 18–7 (72%) | 9–8 (53%) | 104.4 | -1.52 | 1990 | 1863 | 156.8 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -32 | -251 | 63.3% | +1.10 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | 97.9 | -0.68 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1966 | 166.2 | +1.99 | +7.08 | 1.233 | 54.0% | +51 | -96 | — | 65.1% | +1.24 | 16–8 (67%) | 8–18 (31%) | 90.4 | -1.65 | 1991 | 2049 | 168.0 | +6.14 | +3.91 | 1.266 | 54.2% | +16 | -86 | -347 | 71.0% | +1.28 | 14–5 (74%) | 12–9 (57%) | 106.5 | -2.20 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1992 | 160.0 | +2.60 | +5.19 | 1.207 | 53.4% | +28 | -138 | -270 | 66.4% | +1.22 | 23–10 (70%) | 12–16 (43%) | 100.1 | +1.44 | 1992 | 2075 | 169.6 | +6.83 | +4.55 | 1.332 | 54.9% | +18 | +15 | -351 | 74.4% | +1.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 24–11 (69%) | 105.2 | -1.89 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2007 | 157.5 | +3.82 | +5.50 | 1.290 | 54.5% | -9 | -130 | -197 | 71.3% | +1.45 | 14–8 (64%) | 19–7 (73%) | 103.3 | +0.39 | 1993 | 1959 | 164.0 | +6.33 | +3.71 | 1.299 | 54.3% | -24 | +192 | -55 | 73.5% | +1.61 | 9–7 (56%) | 15–12 (56%) | 95.7 | -1.11 |
| 23 | 1995 | 2011 | 165.8 | +4.79 | +5.90 | 1.302 | 54.6% | +1 | +38 | — | 70.0% | +1.41 | 16–5 (76%) | 15–11 (58%) | 105.2 | -0.91 | 1994 | 1890 | 155.5 | +5.14 | +2.68 | 1.228 | 53.4% | +9 | +222 | -1 | 66.7% | +1.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–13 (43%) | 90.0 | +0.52 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1992 | 167.8 | +3.39 | +6.79 | 1.284 | 54.8% | +58 | -22 | — | 70.3% | +1.62 | 16–3 (84%) | 11–9 (55%) | 105.9 | -0.94 | 1995 | 1990 | 160.9 | +5.29 | +3.10 | 1.233 | 53.6% | +22 | +69 | -186 | 71.5% | +1.26 | 10–8 (56%) | 26–14 (65%) | 102.8 | -0.63 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1911 | 157.1 | +2.72 | +5.34 | 1.224 | 53.9% | +68 | +21 | -176 | 66.3% | +1.37 | 17–7 (71%) | 13–12 (52%) | 100.4 | +0.71 | 1996 | 1852 | 152.7 | +4.18 | +1.56 | 1.183 | 52.8% | +59 | +140 | -53 | 60.7% | +0.83 | 4–7 (36%) | 12–11 (52%) | 93.2 | -0.33 |
| 26 | 1998 | 1849 | 144.8 | +1.95 | +2.83 | 1.163 | 52.9% | +24 | +87 | — | 65.1% | +1.02 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–7 (53%) | 93.9 | +2.82 | 1997 | 1828 | 150.6 | +2.66 | +1.74 | 1.095 | 51.4% | +66 | +101 | -50 | 62.0% | +0.60 | 8–11 (42%) | 12–10 (55%) | 92.2 | -1.90 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1791 | 141.4 | +0.54 | +2.18 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +20 | +46 | — | 54.0% | +0.38 | 9–9 (50%) | 10–14 (42%) | 93.2 | +0.91 | 1998 | 1737 | 137.2 | +2.52 | -1.01 | 1.053 | 50.7% | +53 | +134 | — | 51.1% | +0.11 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | 97.8 | +0.91 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1807 | 140.0 | -0.26 | +3.59 | 1.080 | 51.7% | -11 | -12 | -72 | 56.2% | +0.47 | 15–9 (63%) | 13–10 (57%) | 100.6 | +0.86 | 1999 | 1795 | 135.6 | +4.87 | -0.80 | 1.155 | 52.2% | -5 | +9 | -45 | 56.8% | +0.45 | 12–5 (71%) | 20–11 (65%) | 110.4 | +0.59 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1699 | 128.0 | -1.43 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 49.8% | -10 | +24 | -7 | 44.9% | -0.13 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–9 (25%) | 95.3 | +0.59 | 2000 | 1737 | 117.5 | +0.53 | -1.12 | 0.982 | 49.4% | -2 | — | — | 48.0% | -0.44 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.0 | +0.33 |
| 30 | 2002 | 1624 | 130.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.882 | 48.0% | +20 | +41 | +34 | 35.3% | -0.71 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–7 (42%) | 97.3 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 1551 | 127.1 | -0.91 | -1.10 | 0.800 | 46.1% | +26 | — | — | 24.1% | -1.59 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2114 | 161.6 | +2.11 | +4.69 | 1.178 | 53.1% | +21 | -33 | -160 | 62.8% | +0.99 | 188–106 (64%) | 147–149 (50%) | 98.2 | -0.36 | — | 2217 | 162.1 | +5.11 | +2.51 | 1.217 | 53.3% | +16 | +52 | -127 | 65.7% | +1.03 | 104–89 (54%) | 174–120 (59%) | 100.1 | -1.47 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 12 | 12 | 24 | Feb 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 7 | 15 | 22 | Mar 19, 2003 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 9 | 12 | 21 | Aug 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 8 | 12 | 20 | Jul 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Todd Woodbridge | 14 | 3 | 17 | Oct 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 12 | 12 | 24 | Feb 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 4 | 16 | 20 | Mar 17, 1999 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 7 | 5 | 12 | Mar 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jan 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 9 | 2 | 11 | Aug 7, 1999 | H2H |