H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jim Courier H2H: 12-12

Michael Chang and Jim Courier are tied 12–12 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 24 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 8–7 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 5–2 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Memphis third round 6-4 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
12 – 12
24 main draw meetings
Jim Courier
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 1999* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Courier #69 6-4 7-6(8) Michael Chang #27 Match data
Jul 25, 1998* Washington ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #19 6-3 6-4 Jim Courier #47 Match data
Apr 26, 1998* Orlando ATP 250 F Clay Jim Courier #57 7-5 3-6 7-5 Michael Chang #12 Match data
Oct 26, 1996* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #2 7-5 6-2 Jim Courier #15 Match data
Nov 14, 1995 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Michael Chang #4 6-2 7-5 Jim Courier #7 Match data
Nov 5, 1995* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Jim Courier #7 6-2 7-6(5) Michael Chang #4 Match data
Sep 8, 1995* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Jim Courier #15 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 7-5 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Aug 13, 1995* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Chang #5 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 Jim Courier #15 Match data
Apr 22, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #8 6-4 6-2 Jim Courier #12 Match data
Apr 15, 1995* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Jim Courier #15 6-4 7-5 Michael Chang #6 Match data
Feb 11, 1995* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #6 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Jim Courier #11 Match data
Feb 19, 1994* Philadelphia ATP 250 SF Carpet Michael Chang #9 7-6(6) 6-2 Jim Courier #3 Match data
Nov 15, 1993 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Michael Chang #7 6-4 6-0 Jim Courier #2 Match data
May 16, 1993* Rome Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Jim Courier #2 6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 Michael Chang #10 Match data
Apr 17, 1993* Hong Kong ATP 250 SF Hard Jim Courier #2 6-2 6-3 Michael Chang #9 Match data
Mar 7, 1993* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Jim Courier #1 6-4 6-4 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Nov 16, 1992 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Jim Courier #1 7-5 6-2 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Apr 19, 1992* Hong Kong ATP 250 F Hard Jim Courier #1 7-5 6-3 Michael Chang #6 Match data
Apr 11, 1992* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Jim Courier #2 6-2 6-3 Michael Chang #6 Match data
Mar 19, 1992* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Michael Chang #9 6-2 6-4 Jim Courier #1 Match data
Feb 9, 1992* San Francisco ATP 250 F Hard Michael Chang #16 6-3 6-3 Jim Courier #2 Match data
Dec 14, 1991* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Michael Chang #15 6-4 6-2 Jim Courier #2 Match data
Aug 10, 1991* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jim Courier #5 7-5 6-2 Michael Chang #24 Match data
Aug 19, 1989* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-3 6-3 Jim Courier #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 — — — — — — —
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —