H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jim Grabb H2H: 6-2

Michael Chang holds a 6–2 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1995 Miami Masters second round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1995* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Michael Chang #4 6-0 6-3 Jim Grabb #70 Match data
Feb 24, 1995* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #6 7-6(5) 7-5 Jim Grabb #71 Match data
Sep 4, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-1 4-1 (ret.) Jim Grabb #95 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Michael Chang #8 6-3 7-6(1) 6-1 Jim Grabb #130 Match data
Apr 17, 1992* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-2 6-4 Jim Grabb #74 Match data
Feb 20, 1992* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jim Grabb #88 6-3 3-6 6-2 Michael Chang #12 Match data
Aug 17, 1989* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-3 5-7 7-6 Jim Grabb #62 Match data
Aug 5, 1989* Stratton Mountain ATP 250 QF Hard Jim Grabb #114 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 — — — — — — —
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2