H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 2-0

Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1992 Long Island fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1992* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #4 (w/o) Jimmy Connors #33 Match data
Jun 2, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Michael Chang #10 4-6 7-5 6-2 4-6 (ret.) Jimmy Connors #324 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109