H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 3-2

Michael Chang holds a 3–2 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 7-6(4) 7-6(1) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jonas Bjorkman #41 7-6(4) 7-6(1) 6-4 Michael Chang #48 Match data
Nov 10, 1997 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Jonas Bjorkman #4 6-4 7-5 Michael Chang #2 Match data
Mar 21, 1996* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #4 6-3 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #35 Match data
Apr 23, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 F Hard Michael Chang #8 6-3 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #27 Match data
Oct 2, 1993* Kuala Lumpur (2) ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #8 7-5 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #107 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Jonas Bjorkman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6