H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michael Chang vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 0-1
Magnus Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1994 Stockholm Masters third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1994* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Magnus Larsson | 6-4 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Magnus Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 |