H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 3-5

Mark Philippoussis holds a 5–3 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2003 Los Angeles fourth round 6-2 6-4.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #20 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #168 Match data
Mar 21, 2001* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 7-6(2) 6-4 Michael Chang #35 Match data
Nov 11, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #23 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 Michael Chang #51 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 7-6(1) 2-6 6-3 5-7 7-5 Michael Chang #27 Match data
Feb 22, 1998* Memphis ATP 250 F Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 6-3 6-2 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Oct 31, 1996* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Michael Chang #2 7-5 3-6 7-6(7) Mark Philippoussis #30 Match data
Oct 15, 1995* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 F Carpet Michael Chang #5 6-3 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #60 Match data
May 17, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Michael Chang #5 6-4 6-3 Mark Philippoussis #132 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34