H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 3-2

Michael Chang holds a 3–2 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Michael Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1993 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-3.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 1993* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #7 4-6 6-1 6-3 Mark Woodforde #24 Match data
Feb 20, 1993* Philadelphia ATP 250 QF Carpet Mark Woodforde #41 6-3 6-4 Michael Chang #7 Match data
Nov 14, 1992* Antwerp ATP 250 SF Carpet Mark Woodforde #61 7-6(5) 6-3 Michael Chang #6 Match data
Oct 10, 1991* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Michael Chang #20 6-1 6-4 Mark Woodforde #115 Match data
Aug 28, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Michael Chang #22 6-3 6-0 6-2 Mark Woodforde #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4