H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Michael Stich H2H: 3-3

Michael Chang and Michael Stich are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1995 Cincinnati Masters semifinal 4-6 6-2 7-6(5).

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 1995* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Michael Chang #5 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) Michael Stich #8 Match data
Jun 7, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Michael Chang #6 1-6 6-0 6-2 6-3 Michael Stich #12 Match data
Nov 15, 1993 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Michael Stich #3 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Michael Chang #7 Match data
Dec 14, 1992* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals F Carpet Michael Stich #15 6-2 6-3 6-2 Michael Chang #6 Match data
Nov 14, 1992* Antwerp ATP 250 QF Carpet Michael Chang #6 6-3 6-4 Michael Stich #15 Match data
Feb 23, 1991* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Stich #25 6-2 6-2 Michael Chang #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Michael Stich #116 #2 3,445 2,119 350 162 68.4% 1 2 2 0 13 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Michael Stich
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1989 11–12 47.8% #100 1,586 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1990 29–23 55.8% #42 1,781 0 1
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1991 68–23 74.7% #4 1,989 1 5
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1992 42–19 68.9% #15 2,016 1 7
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1993 67–19 77.9% #2 2,082 1 13
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1994 54–21 72.0% #9 1,925 1 16
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1995 39–18 68.4% #12 1,895 1 17
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1996 25–15 62.5% #16 1,828 1 18
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1997 15–12 55.6% #64 1,842 1 18
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34