H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Michael Chang vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-0

Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2003 Miami Masters first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 18, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Michael Chang #122 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #74 Match data
Aug 16, 2001* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #63 3-6 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6