H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Chang vs Patrick McEnroe H2H: 2-0
Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Patrick McEnroe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1992 US Open second round 6-3 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-3 6-3 6-4 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
| Dec 15, 1991* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | QF | Carpet | Michael Chang | 6-2 6-4 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Patrick McEnroe | #1,303 | #28 | 990 | 1,842 | 140 | 164 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Patrick McEnroe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1985 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #494 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #356 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #120 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1991 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #36 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1992 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1994 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 1995 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #408 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #699 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |