H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 8-1

Michael Chang holds a 8–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–0 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1998 Shanghai semifinal 7-5 6-3.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
8 1
9 main draw meetings
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 1998* Shanghai ATP 250 SF Carpet Michael Chang #33 7-5 6-3 Paul Haarhuis #65 Match data
Aug 30, 1998* Boston ATP 250 F Hard Michael Chang #22 6-3 6-4 Paul Haarhuis #85 Match data
Jul 20, 1996* Washington ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #5 6-4 6-3 Paul Haarhuis #25 Match data
Mar 18, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Michael Chang #4 7-5 6-1 6-1 Paul Haarhuis #27 Match data
Feb 25, 1995* Philadelphia ATP 250 SF Carpet Michael Chang #6 6-2 6-0 Paul Haarhuis #47 Match data
Feb 20, 1994* Philadelphia ATP 250 F Carpet Michael Chang #9 6-3 6-2 Paul Haarhuis #36 Match data
Jun 23, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Michael Chang #11 6-2 6-2 4-6 6-7(5) 6-4 Paul Haarhuis #64 Match data
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Michael Chang #6 6-4 6-3 6-3 Paul Haarhuis #31 Match data
May 9, 1992* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Paul Haarhuis #35 7-6(5) 7-6(8) Michael Chang #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,885 250 245 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,668 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,728 0 0
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1992 32–28 53.3% #39 1,681 0 0
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,762 0 0
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,714 0 0
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,714 0 1
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1996 30–27 52.6% #25 1,746 0 1
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,676 0 1
32 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,663 0 1
33 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1