H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Michael Chang vs Rainer Schuettler H2H: 1-0
Michael Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1999 Stuttgart Masters second round 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1999* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Michael Chang | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michael Chang | Rainer Schuettler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 |
| 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 |
| 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |