H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Michael Chang vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 2-1
Michael Chang holds a 2–1 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1995 Beijing final 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1995* | Beijing | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Michael Chang | 7-5 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1994* | San Jose | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Renzo Furlan | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| May 14, 1992* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Michael Chang | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |