H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michael Chang vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 3-7
Richard Krajicek holds a 7–3 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Canada Masters third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
7
10 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-2 7-5 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2000* | Halle | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Richard Krajicek | 6-2 6-1 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1997* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Michael Chang | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1997* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Richard Krajicek | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1996 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1996* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-4 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1993* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 0-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1992 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1992* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(4) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-1 5-7 1-6 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |