H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 6-1

Michael Chang holds a 6–1 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1997 Memphis quarterfinal 6-7(4) 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #4 6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 Richey Reneberg #28 Match data Feb 22, 1997* QF Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Michael Chang #2 6-2 7-5 6-1 Richey Reneberg #31 Match data Jan 17, 1997* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Richey Reneberg #63 6-4 7-6(3) Michael Chang #4 Match data Apr 20, 1996* QF Japan Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Michael Chang #7 6-2 6-4 Richey Reneberg #67 Match data Feb 12, 1993* R16 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Michael Chang #17 4-6 6-1 6-2 Richey Reneberg #33 Match data Nov 9, 1991* SF Birmingham ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Michael Chang #5 7-6 6-4 Richey Reneberg #75 Match data Sep 28, 1989* R32 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Michael Chang #25 6-1 7-5 Richey Reneberg #80 Match data Feb 23, 1989* R32 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Richey Reneberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Richey Reneberg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0%
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3%
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2%
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3%
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5%
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3%
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8%
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Richey Reneberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.09
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) — -2.96
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.41
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.36
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) — +1.77
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.14
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.80
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.33
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.47
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) — -3.44
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.