H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 6-1

Michael Chang holds a 6–1 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1997 Memphis quarterfinal 6-7(4) 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 1997* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #4 6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 Richey Reneberg #28 Match data
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Michael Chang #2 6-2 7-5 6-1 Richey Reneberg #31 Match data
Apr 20, 1996* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Richey Reneberg #63 6-4 7-6(3) Michael Chang #4 Match data
Feb 12, 1993* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #7 6-2 6-4 Richey Reneberg #67 Match data
Nov 9, 1991* Birmingham ATP 250 SF Carpet Michael Chang #17 4-6 6-1 6-2 Richey Reneberg #33 Match data
Sep 28, 1989* San Francisco ATP 250 R32 Carpet Michael Chang #5 7-6 6-4 Richey Reneberg #75 Match data
Feb 23, 1989* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Michael Chang #25 6-1 7-5 Richey Reneberg #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3