H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Scott Draper H2H: 2-3

Scott Draper holds a 3–2 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Scott Draper leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Scott Draper won the 1999 Adelaide fourth round 6-3 7-6(6).

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Scott Draper #51 6-3 7-6(6) Michael Chang #29 Match data
Jul 25, 1998* Washington ATP 250 SF Hard Scott Draper #71 (w/o) Michael Chang #19 Match data
Jul 19, 1997* Washington ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #2 6-2 6-3 Scott Draper #66 Match data
Jun 12, 1997* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Scott Draper #78 6-3 2-6 7-6(6) Michael Chang #2 Match data
Feb 22, 1996* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #5 6-3 5-7 6-2 Scott Draper #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Scott Draper #1,110 #42 957 1,832 107 126 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Scott Draper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1995 13–13 50.0% #87 1,645 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1996 18–24 42.9% #95 1,664 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1997 23–20 53.5% #58 1,719 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1998 23–17 57.5% #51 1,791 0 1
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1999 11–17 39.3% #154 1,627 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 2000 2–5 28.6% #258 1,589 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2001 2–5 28.6% #221 1,596 0 1
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2002 2–5 28.6% #137 1,608 0 1
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2003 13–16 44.8% #103 1,686 0 1
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2005 0–4 0.0% #718 1,635 0 1