H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Sebastien De Chaunac H2H: 0-1

Sebastien De Chaunac holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien De Chaunac leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sebastien De Chaunac won the 2002 Roland Garros round of 128 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Sebastien De Chaunac
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sebastien De Chaunac #173 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #93 Match data May 29, 2002* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Sebastien De Chaunac #952 #130 428 1,657 11 22 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Sebastien De Chaunac
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 — — — — — — —
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 — — — — — — —
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 — — — — — — —
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 2001 0–1 0.0% #186 1,529 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 2002 1–2 33.3% #206 1,522 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 — — — — — — —
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 2004 3–5 37.5% #220 1,524 0 0
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 2005 2–5 28.6% #236 1,493 0 0
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 2006 0–1 0.0% #601 1,472 0 0
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 2007 0–1 0.0% #377 1,506 0 0
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,514 0 0
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2009 5–5 50.0% #140 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Sebastien De Chaunac
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 10 18 28 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 28/29 of Sebastien De Chaunac's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Sebastien De Chaunac
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% 2004 8/8 5.1 5.6 56.2% 66.9% 47.9% 46.2% 33.3% 58.5% 31.5%
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% 2005 6/7 6.2 3.3 55.3% 69.7% 49.7% 62.5% 42.6% 60.9% 35.4%
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% 2006 1/1 2.0 0.0 59.7% 65.0% 51.9% 70.0% 0.0% 59.7% 25.0%
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% 2007 1/1 7.0 2.0 60.7% 74.3% 47.9% 63.6% 30.0% 63.9% 32.2%
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% 2008 2/2 6.0 1.0 56.3% 65.9% 48.5% 27.8% 66.7% 58.1% 26.9%
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% 2009 10/10 7.0 4.5 51.0% 74.7% 48.0% 59.3% 32.2% 61.5% 33.8%
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 28/33 6.0 4.1 54.5% 70.4% 48.5% 54.5% 36.0% 60.3% 32.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Sebastien De Chaunac
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 2000 1501 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 2001 1529 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.16
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 2002 1522 107.8 — — — — — +7 — 36.4% -1.18 1–1 1–1 — -0.05
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 2003 1494 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 2004 1525 112.4 -2.44 -1.09 0.759 45.9% +87 — — 31.6% -1.26 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.13
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 2005 1493 107.9 -1.10 -0.18 0.905 48.4% +56 — — 28.6% -0.64 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.12
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 2006 1472 99.4 +1.35 -1.93 0.620 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 2007 1507 103.5 +3.84 +0.85 0.893 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 2008 1514 114.1 -0.58 -2.29 0.641 43.1% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.13
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 2009 1614 118.1 -2.48 -0.79 0.878 48.2% +39 — — 46.4% -0.64 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.41
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1544 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1657 114.1 -1.67 -0.83 0.821 47.1% +58 +7 — 34.1% -1.09 6–9 (40%) 8–11 (42%) 98.9 -1.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.