H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 2-3

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–2 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 7-6(2) 6-3 4-6 6-1.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sjeng Schalken #23 7-6(2) 6-3 4-6 6-1 Michael Chang #99 Match data
Oct 6, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #24 6-1 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #54 Match data
Aug 9, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sjeng Schalken #52 6-4 4-6 6-4 Michael Chang #22 Match data
May 5, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Sjeng Schalken #53 6-7(3) 6-1 7-6(5) Michael Chang #42 Match data
Mar 13, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #3 6-4 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Sjeng Schalken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34