H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Chang vs Thomas Muster H2H: 3-5
Thomas Muster holds a 5–3 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1999 Rome Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
5
8 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1999* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Michael Chang | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1997* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1997* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-1 7-6(1) | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1996 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Thomas Muster | 6-4 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1995 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Michael Chang | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | F | Clay | Thomas Muster | 7-5 6-2 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| May 21, 1995* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-3 6-2 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-1 5-7 7-6(3) | Michael Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Thomas Muster | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 |