H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Thomas Muster H2H: 3-5

Thomas Muster holds a 5–3 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1999 Rome Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Michael Chang #46 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 Thomas Muster #40 Match data
Aug 10, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Thomas Muster #4 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) Michael Chang #2 Match data
Mar 16, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Michael Chang #3 6-1 7-6(1) Thomas Muster #2 Match data
Nov 19, 1996 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Thomas Muster #5 6-4 6-3 Michael Chang #2 Match data
Nov 14, 1995 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Michael Chang #4 4-6 6-2 6-3 Thomas Muster #3 Match data
Jun 12, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Thomas Muster #3 7-5 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #5 Match data
May 21, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Thomas Muster #10 6-3 6-2 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Mar 11, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Muster #18 6-1 5-7 7-6(3) Michael Chang #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44