H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Todd Martin H2H: 5-2

Michael Chang holds a 5–2 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2000 US Open second round 6-4 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Todd Martin #32 6-4 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #25 Match data
Feb 22, 1997* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #4 3-6 6-4 6-4 Todd Martin #12 Match data
Jul 29, 1995* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #5 6-3 6-2 Todd Martin #18 Match data
May 6, 1995* Atlanta ATP 250 SF Clay Michael Chang #6 6-3 6-0 Todd Martin #15 Match data
Oct 15, 1994* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 QF Carpet Michael Chang #9 6-3 7-6(6) Todd Martin #7 Match data
May 1, 1994* Atlanta ATP 250 F Clay Michael Chang #7 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-0 Todd Martin #9 Match data
Feb 13, 1993* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Todd Martin #96 7-6(4) 6-4 Michael Chang #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8