H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Tommy Ho H2H: 2-0

Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1994 San Jose round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tommy Ho
USA Age 53 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #9 6-3 6-4 Tommy Ho #152 Match data Feb 3, 1994* R32 San Jose ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Michael Chang #7 6-2 6-3 Tommy Ho #150 Match data Oct 23, 1993* SF China Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Tommy Ho #1,306 #85 522 1,622 36 66 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Tommy Ho
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #625 1,493 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1989 0–5 0.0% #641 1,444 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 1990 2–2 50.0% #182 1,490 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1991 2–4 33.3% #224 1,491 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1992 4–4 50.0% #154 1,561 0 0
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1993 7–14 33.3% #132 1,553 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1994 2–10 16.7% #165 1,484 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1995 14–16 46.7% #127 1,562 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1996 1–2 33.3% #482 1,556 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1997 3–4 42.9% #250 1,560 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,546 0 0
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 — — — — — — —
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 — — — — — — —
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 — — — — — — —
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 — — — — — — —
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 — — — — — — —
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Tommy Ho
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1990 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1995 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 22 45 67 32.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 77/88 of Tommy Ho's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Tommy Ho
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/6 3.8 4.0 60.8% 67.1% 54.3% 60.6% 59.4% 61.7% 34.4%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% 1992 7/8 5.9 2.7 66.3% 72.4% 50.0% 54.5% 47.7% 64.8% 38.6%
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% 1993 18/21 3.4 3.6 61.8% 67.6% 49.4% 56.5% 32.0% 60.3% 33.5%
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% 1994 12/12 2.8 3.0 58.9% 64.4% 50.4% 47.3% 37.4% 58.7% 36.2%
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% 1995 26/30 4.2 2.4 58.6% 71.7% 50.0% 51.9% 41.7% 62.6% 38.6%
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% 1996 3/3 6.0 0.3 63.6% 68.9% 61.0% 76.2% 37.0% 66.1% 33.1%
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% 1997 6/7 5.7 2.5 56.5% 74.3% 52.5% 67.4% 68.7% 64.8% 35.7%
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.5% 52.8% 47.4% 50.0% 50.0% 50.9% 25.0%
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 77/102 4.1 2.8 60.3% 69.3% 50.7% 55.1% 42.3% 61.8% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Tommy Ho
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 1988 1493 111.5 — — — — +31 — — 16.7% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — -0.44
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 1989 1444 98.2 — — — — +20 — — 9.1% -2.27 0–1 — — +0.20
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 1990 1490 118.0 — — — — +32 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1991 1492 106.7 -0.42 -1.22 0.898 47.8% +20 — — 40.0% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1992 1561 120.9 +0.64 +0.42 1.096 51.0% +23 — — 59.1% +0.41 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.42
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1993 1553 117.7 -1.61 -2.42 0.843 46.9% +25 — — 40.7% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.53
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1994 1484 112.9 -1.58 -0.49 0.877 47.5% +17 — — 25.0% -1.14 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.63
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1995 1562 130.5 +0.48 +1.09 1.031 50.3% +18 — +36 49.4% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.89
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1996 1557 112.9 -0.28 +0.97 0.978 49.8% +16 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1997 1561 115.7 +1.65 -1.05 1.015 50.2% +16 — — 47.4% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.34
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1998 1546 96.1 -1.39 -2.17 0.509 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1622 127.2 -0.32 -0.37 0.946 48.8% +21 — +36 40.7% -0.54 9–23 (28%) 18–24 (43%) 91.9 +2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.