H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 4-0

Michael Chang holds a 4–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2001 Memphis third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2001* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #33 6-3 6-2 Vincent Spadea #196 Match data
Sep 1, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Michael Chang #3 6-4 5-7 2-6 7-5 6-3 Vincent Spadea #69 Match data
Jul 19, 1996* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #5 6-3 5-7 6-0 Vincent Spadea #68 Match data
Feb 17, 1995* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #5 2-6 6-1 6-4 Vincent Spadea #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Michael Chang Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1