H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 7-0

Michael Chang holds a 7–0 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 6–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2000 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 2000* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #23 6-3 7-6(7) Wayne Ferreira #30 Match data
May 10, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Michael Chang #32 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) Wayne Ferreira #50 Match data
Aug 7, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #2 6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #27 Match data
Jul 21, 1996* Washington ATP 250 F Hard Michael Chang #5 6-2 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #13 Match data
Sep 8, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Michael Chang #7 6-4 6-3 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #19 Match data
Sep 11, 1992* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Michael Chang #4 7-5 2-6 6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 Wayne Ferreira #11 Match data
Mar 9, 1991* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #13 6-3 3-6 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15