H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michael Chang vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 2-0
Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2000 Stuttgart Masters fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2000* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Michael Chang | 7-5 6-2 | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1994* | Jakarta | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-3 6-3 | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Younes El Aynaoui | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |