H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 2-0

Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2000 Stuttgart Masters round of 16 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #24 7-5 6-2 Younes El Aynaoui #21 Match data Nov 4, 2000* R16 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Michael Chang #7 6-3 6-3 Younes El Aynaoui #54 Match data Jan 15, 1994* SF Jakarta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Younes El Aynaoui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Younes El Aynaoui
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 666/795 of Michael Chang's and 88/97 of Younes El Aynaoui's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Chang Younes El Aynaoui
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6% 2003 58/64 10.7 2.9 65.7% 75.4% 50.8% 67.6% 41.2% 66.9% 35.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/5 1.0 3.3 64.2% 48.9% 32.0% 46.9% 0.0% 42.4% 21.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/11 2.4 3.5 61.8% 60.7% 40.1% 48.9% 25.2% 52.9% 31.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/4 5.7 2.0 56.4% 78.3% 53.6% 57.8% 33.0% 67.0% 39.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 5.0 1.8 67.9% 69.5% 44.5% 53.4% 35.1% 62.0% 30.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/7 9.5 2.7 64.0% 77.9% 48.6% 64.3% 58.3% 67.4% 36.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 8.0 3.0 59.3% 78.4% 40.6% 58.3% 12.5% 62.9% 30.8%
Career — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5% — 88/465 8.6 2.9 64.7% 72.4% 48.0% 62.9% 37.3% 63.8% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Younes El Aynaoui
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.3 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) 103.5 -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) 105.1 -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) 103.0 -1.26 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 104.4 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) 90.4 -1.65 1992 1532 116.7 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) 100.1 +1.44 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) 103.3 +0.39 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) 105.2 -0.91 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) 105.9 -0.94 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) 100.4 +0.71 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 93.9 +2.82 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) 93.2 +0.91 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) 100.6 +0.86 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 +0.59 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.3 -0.72 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1592 109.0 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.