H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michael Lammer vs Dustin Brown H2H: 1-0
Michael Lammer holds a 1–0 lead over Dustin Brown in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Lammer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Lammer won the 2010 Gstaad third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2010* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Michael Lammer | 7-5 7-5 | Dustin Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Lammer | #1,041 | #150 | 362 | 1,647 | 6 | 16 | 27.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Lammer | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #220 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #251 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #251 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |