H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Michael Llodra vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Michael Llodra holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2013 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2013* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 7-5 6-3 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Llodra | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |