H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Michael Llodra vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 0-2
Joachim Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joachim Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2004 US Open fourth round 6-2 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 6-2 6-3 6-2 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2004* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Llodra | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |